The paper compared favourably (mean 52 and a standard deviation of 14.70) with that of 2012 diet (mean of 42 and a standard deviation of 6.40) in terms of quality and standard. The rubrics were clear and the tasks required of the candidates were within the syllabus.

The performance of the candidates in Question 2 was higher than that in Question 1.

Generally, what the candidates were asked to do were not above the specifications in the syllabus.