This paper was reported to be within the scope of the WASSCE Syllabus and comparable with the previous year.  There was no ambiguity nor questions that were non syllabic, the marking scheme was adequately prepared to capture the expected responses,  marks were also fairly and judiciously awarded.  However, some of the questions were reported to be too demanding and it was suggested that more time should have been allotted to the paper, the candidates performed below average when compared with those of previous years.