|
General Comments
|
The standard of the paper compared favourably with those of previous years. The questions covered a wide range of the syllabus. The rubrics were also clear and concise. While the marking scheme was adequate and exhaustive. There was significant improvement in the candidates’ performance to last year given the raw mean score of 21 and standard deviation of 1.39 compared to a raw mean score
of 23 and standard deviation of 11.00 in the May/June 2010. |
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________ |
|
|