The paper was better (total sat of 321, mean 59 and a standard deviation of 16.49) on comparing with that of 2012, 2011 and 2010 diets (total sat of 301, 353 and 334, mean of 51,33 and 42; and standard deviations of 14.93, 5.39 and 12.33 respectively) in terms of quality and standard.
The questions were within the syllabus. The marking scheme was detailed. Candidates’ performance was reported better when compared with those of the past three years.