|
General Comments
|
The standard of the paper was of good quality and compared favourably with those of
previous years. The questions covered the syllabus. While the rubrics were clear and the
marking scheme was adequate and tion of 11.00 compared to a raw mean score of
and a standard deviation of 10.30 in the Mexhaustive.
The performance of the candidates was slightly better than that of the previous year given
the raw mean score of 23 and a standard deviaay/June 2010 WASSCE.
|
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________ |
|
|