The standard of the paper compared favorably with those of previous years. The questions covered wide range of the examination syllabus and the rubrics were clearly worded. Also, the marking scheme was adequate and exhaustive. The performance of the candidates was poorer that of previous year given the raw mean score of 17 and a standard deviation of 9.38 compared to a raw mean score of 22 and a standard deviation of 10.63 in the May/June 2009 WASSCE.