The paper was of the same standard with those of the previous years in content and
           scope.  The questions were well framed in simple comprehensible language.  The content
           of the paper is widely spread to cover the syllabus considerably.  The items and rubrics
           were unambiguous.  The   time allocated was quite adequate.

            The marking scheme was quite clear and detailed.  The performance of the candidate
            was slightly better compared to that of the previous year.  The candidature of 159,099
            recorded  a raw  mean  score of 16 and a standard deviation of 09.27 as against a raw
            mean score of 15 and a standard deviation of  08.77 in the November/December 2010
            WASSCE with a candidature of 127326.