In terms of quality, adequacy, objectivity and content, the paper is at par with those of previous years as it maintained its high standard, validity and reliability. All the questions were also within the scope of WASSCE syllabus.
The questions were clear, straightforward and devoid of any ambiguity. Similarly, the rubrics were clearly stated while the marking scheme was elastic enough to accommodate all possible answers. However, candidate’ performance is dishearten and far below average when compared with previous years.