General Comments

 

 

The standard of the paper compared favorably with the previous years in terms of the coverage, difficulty level, quality as well as structure. The questions were well framed in simple language. The rubrics were not ambiguous and the marking schemes were quite clear and detailed.

The time allotted for the paper was adequate. The performance of the candidates was comparable to WASSCE for School Candidates 2018. This year paper recorded candidature of 762340 with raw mean score of 26 out of 60 and standard deviation of 09.59 as compared to WASSCE for School Candidates 2018 with a raw mean score of 26 out of 60 and standard deviation of 09.80 with candidature of 728924.