Animal Husbandry Paper 2 May/June 2015

General Comments

The standard of the paper compared favourably with that of the previous year.    
The questions were clearly itemized, unambiguous and comprehensive. 
The marking scheme was flexible and exhaustive and the rubrics were clear.

The performance of the candidates was lower than that of the previous year. 
A total of 363,746 candidates sat for the paper with a raw mean score of 26     
and a standard deviation of 13.60 as against a raw mean score of 33 and a
standard deviation of 16.88 recorded in the May/June 2014 WASSCE with    
candidates’ population of 185,258.