| 
 
 | 
            
              | 
                
                  | General Comments 
                   |  
                  | The standard of the paper  compared favourably with those of previous years.  The  question covered a wide range  of the syllabus and unambiguous.   While the marking    scheme was exhaustive and  flexible. 
 There  was no significant  improvement on the  candidates’ performance compared to last year with a raw mean score of 14 and a  standard deviation of 04.80 Compared to a raw   mean score of 14 and a standard deviation of 04.58 in the  November/December 2010  WASSCE.
 |  
                  | _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ |  |  |