Technical Drawing 2, Nov/Dec 2015

General Comments


The standard of the paper was reported to be of the same standard with those of previous years. The questions were syllabic and of the right standard.  There was no ambiguity in the questions nor questions above the level of the candidates in the paper.

The marking scheme was adequately prepared to capture the expected responses, adequate and alternative solutions where prepared where necessary and marks were fairly and judiciously awarded.

However, candidates’ performance was lower when compared with those of previous years.