IThe paper was comparable with those of previous years in terms of standard, adequacy and objectivity.  The paper had a wide coverage of the syllabus and all the questions were within the scope of the examination syllabus.

The questions were clear, straightforward and devoid of any ambiguity.  Similarly, the rubrics were clearly stated while the marking scheme was elastic and comprehensive enough to accommodate all possible answers.  Also, candidates’ performance was fair when compared with those of recent years.