| 
          
            
              
                
                  General Comment 
                    | 
                 
                
                  The paper compared  favourably with those of the previous years in terms of  
quality and standard. The rubrics were clear and the task required of the  
candidates was unambiguous and within the syllabus.  
The performance of the  candidates was lower than the previous year.   | 
                 
                
                  | _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ | 
                 
                | 
             
            |