Data Processing Paper 2, WASSCE (SC), 2016

General Comments

The Chief Examiner reported that there was an improvement on the standard of the paper compared to that of the previous year but candidates’ performance was a little lower than that of the previous year. According to the report, the paper had a good coverage of the different sections of the syllabus and was within the ability of an average candidate. The rubrics were also reported to be clear and unambiguous. The Marking Scheme was also detailed.

The Chief Examiner also reported that candidates’ performance was at par with that of the previous year.