|
|
General Comments
|
The standard of the paper was of the same level with those of the previous years in respect of the wording of the questions and mark allocation. The language was simple, direct and capable of ensuring better performance of candidates where serious pre-examination preparation was done. The rubrics were clearly stated and marking scheme elaborate.
Candidates’ performance appeared slightly better than that of the previous year in some centres but majority of the centres still recorded poor performance |
| _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ |
|
|
