The standard of the paper compared favourably with those of previous years. The questions covered a wide range of the syllabus. The rubrics were also clear and concise. While the marking scheme was adequate and exhaustive. There was no significance improvement on the candidates' performance compared to last year given the raw mean score of23 and a standard deviation of 16.91 compared to a raw
mean score of23 and a standard deviation of 17.35 in the May/June 2009 WASSCE.