The Chief Examiner reported that the standard of the paper compared favorably with those of the previous years and adequately tested the requisite cognitive and locomotive skills of the candidates.  According to the report, not only were the questions well stated and its demands clearly spelt out, the syllabus was also adequately covered and there were no ambiguous questions. Appropriate diagrams were drawn and were clearly labeled. The rubrics were also reported to be clearly stated. The marking scheme was also reported to be well drawn, very comprehensive and generous to the candidates with marks and weighting appropriately distributed on the strength of the question.
Candidates’ performance was also reported to be slightly better than previous years.  However, their performance in those areas of the syllabus where their performance had been reportedly poor has not changed.