General Comments

The standard of the paper compared favourably with those of previous years. The questions were unambiguous and also covered a wide range of the syllabus. The marking scheme was comprehensive and flexible.

The performance of the candidates was poor than the previous year with a candidates population of 1,655 which had a raw means score of 17, standard deviation 7.07, against a raw mean score of 20, standard deviation of 07.14 for the November/December 2014, WASSCE, which had a candidates population 1, 399.